Conservative Intelligence

Conservative Intelligence

Not Access. Not Lobbying. Just Intelligence.

Reflections On Yesterday’s Autumn Statement

Event date: 6 Dec

Last Updated: Friday, December 7th, 2012

Lord Lamont, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, was the speaker at a lunchtime event yesterday, hosted by ConservativeIntelligence, to reflect on Wednesday’s Autumn Statement. Norman Lamont was the last chancellor to face a large deficit. He faced a deficit of 7% of GDP, more or less where we are now, and that his answer was to introduce a phased programme of tax increases and spending cuts that took effect gradually reducing the deficit as the recovery took a grip. He was the first chancellor to legislate for future years thus binding the hands of his successors as well.

Lord Lamont was supportive of the Chancellor’s biggest decisions and his overall fiscal judgments. He suggested that Wednesday’s Autumn Statement may well prove to have been “George Osborne’s most difficult day”. The situation was “extremely challenging” given that the Coalition started with the worst fiscal situation for a hundred years. Nonetheless borrowing was down this year and was due to fall in every year of this parliament. That, he said, was to be welcomed. Although he personally might have planned to cut more from the very beginning – perhaps, for example, by trimming the aid budget and cutting benefits that went to wealthier pensioners – Osborne had been right in his Statement to let the automatic stabilisers absorb the worse-than-expected global economic environment and not embark upon a further £17 billion of cuts that would have been necessary to offset falling revenues. To chase down the cycle in this way would only cut growth further. The Chancellor had set his course, said Lamont, and he should now pursue it without significant correction. Most importantly, he argued, was the need to wait upon Tolstoy’s two great warriors – Time and Patience.

He gave a particularly warm welcome to the decision to reallocate £5 billion from current to capital spending. Slowly but surely the Coalition was clawing back the cuts in capital expenditure announced by the last Labour government.  The switch from paying benefits to freezing petrol duty and introducing new capital allowances for plant and machinery were also good news for business. The best underlying economic news, he said, were the unemployment numbers – more people were now in work than at any point in UK history – and a 50% increase in exports to the BRICs.

Lord Lamont was reticent about saying where he would have cut further from day one although nodded when asked if more co-payments were probably needed across the public sector. What was key, he said, was that we had to realise that our economic competitors in the Far East were spending a much lower percentage of their incomes on the state and on servicing historic and recent borrowings. UK and European businesses were therefore struggling under a tax burden that was in danger of becoming increasingly uncompetitive. Borrowing was higher in Britain than France or Germany. Our deficit reduction programme had to be ambitious in order not to fall behind our nearest neighbours in terms of first debt and then tax burdens.

His greatest challenge to the Coalition’s economic strategy was on the banking sector which he described as the number one problem. Much more action was still needed, he argued, in order to get credit to hungry parts of the economy. Thought needed to be given to altering capital adequacy requirements so that they became counter-cyclical. He hoped that Mark Carney might look at this question when he succeeded Mervyn King although, he feared, it was getting late in the day by then. Lamont also recommended more bank competition and also large-scale securitisation of the bad debts that were still clogging up the balance sheets of the economy’s biggest lenders.

Asked about the possibility that the Bank of Japan might soften its inflation targeting, permitting a greater annual increase in prices, he dismissed suggestions that the Bank of England should follow suit. The Bank of England had missed its inflation targets for about forty months already. House prices may have stayed flat in nominal terms but because of inflation had fallen in value by about a quarter in large parts of the country, he continued. Inflation had had a similar effect on Britain’s debts. There should be no more permissiveness on prices if we are to avoid an unjust transfer of wealth away from diligent savers and pensioners.

Lord Lamont noted that he had supported the first round of Quantitative Easing in order to counter what had been a 1920s-style contraction in the global money supply in 2008/09. Being outside of the €urozone had not only enabled the UK to enjoy some exports-boosting exchange rate flexibility it had also enabled us to initiate this QE. He was against anymore, however. Inflationary pressures were now too real.

On the Heseltine Review Lord Lamont struck a sceptical note. While he favoured a south-to-north rebalancing of the UK economy – especially through procurement, transport infrastructure and relocations – and greater decentralisation of political power he did not support anything that smacked of an industrial policy. Yes there should be City Challenge-style competitions so that cities and regions could compete to offer innovative programmes in order to win public sector funds but the fastest growing employment category was often “other”. It was “other” because governments, like official statisticians, are rarely able to predict where new jobs or growth are likely to come from.

Finally, on the politics, Lord Lamont was upbeat. The Tories should adopt the message that Bill Clinton issued at the summer’s Democratic convention. The Republican argument was that they had left the biggest economic mess in a hundred years, Clinton joked, and that since the Democrats hadn’t cleared up all of it so far the Republicans should be reelected. Unlike in America where George W Bush’s team were off the scene, Britain’s Labour Party would be led by people whose fingerprints were all over ‘the mess’, making the Clinton attack even easier to press home. Osborne and Cameron should tell the country, Lamont concluded, that a lot had been done but there was a lot was still to do. The British people were wise enough to realise that that message had the benefit of being both fair and true. He was, however, “shocked” at the number of people now paying the 40p tax band. Raising the thresholds should become as big a priority as increasing the basic allowance, he recommended.

From the Conservative Intelligence member's site

Cameron Wants Newark To Be His Springboard

2014’s political calendar is marked by three danger points for David Cameron (that we know of). The first was the European elections, when some feared that Conservative MPs would panic in the face of a UKIP victory. The second was the Newark by-election, when a defeat in this ultra-safe seat would have marked the start […]

Newark: Cameron’s Survival Moment?

The Newark by-election takes place in less than a week and, although the outcome is uncertain, we already know what will happen to at least one of the four main parties. The Liberal Democrats will get a bad result and come fourth – if not lower.  Reports this week suggest that they have been too […]

Farage Has Upstaged Miliband, But Helps Cameron To Look Serious

UKIP’s electoral success puts pressure on all the conventional parties, but most of all on Labour.  Ed Miliband has been comprehensively upstaged by Nigel Farage. Labour enjoyed a prolonged lead in the polls mainly because early in this Parliament, a large number of Liberal Democrats switched their support to it. They had not voted Lib […]

MPs Start To Regret Fixed Term Parliaments

Amid all the kerfuffle over the AV referendum, nobody noticed that another, equally important, constitutional change was being introduced. If anyone considered fixed term parliaments, it was only to add it to the list of things given to the Lib Dems to keep them happy, and little more. But fast-forward four years, and that change […]

15 Questions That Follow If Scotland Votes For Independence

 Will the Prime Minister resign – as a matter of honour because Scotland has been lost on his watch? Will he be forced to resign even if he is unwilling to do so?  46 letters of no confidence in him from Conservative backbenchers are required for a ballot of confidence in his leadership to be […]

The Past Destroyed Miller – Might Her Replacement Be The Conservative Party’s Future?

The Maria Miller scandal was rooted firmly in the past – the sins of the old expenses system still haunt Parliament, even years after it was abolished. The reshuffle following her resignation, though, was entirely about the future. First, there’s the short-term future of the Coalition government. Even before the expenses scandal reignited, DCMS was […]

The Crucial Importance Of Graham Brady

Four days after the 2010 general election of that year, the 1922 Committee of Conservative MPs met in the Commons.  David Cameron persuaded it to support in principle the formation of a coalition with the Liberal Democrats, arguing that the alternative was a Labour-LibDem Government that would force electoral reform through the Commons without a […]

Cameron The Pragmatist Pushes His Rivals Towards The Margins Of Politics

A point sometimes arrives, in a game of bridge, when it becomes clear that the cards are falling right for a player. Almost everything attempted by that player comes off, not only because of his or her own skill, but because of the distribution of cards in his or her opponents’ hands, and the inability […]

Osborne Will Be Pleased With The Revolution In His Fortunes

What a difference two years makes. At this point in 2012, George Osborne’s budget was under fire from all sides, and the Chancellor himself found both his competence and career being called into question. That must now seem like a bad dream, as he reviews the 2014 headlines hailing his policy radicalism and political nous. […]

The Boris Problem – And How To Minimise It.

Some readers of this newsletter will have followed this week’s headlines about Tory tensions involving George Osborne, Michael Gove and Boris Johnson.  They therefore won’t be familiar with the detail – but will have picked up a clear impression: namely, that the flow of stories about possible future Conservative leaders has done nothing to help […]

© 2014 Conservative Intelligence | About | Contact Conservative Intelligence | Register | Website by Tjugo Tjugo