Conservative Intelligence

Conservative Intelligence

This site is currently down for maintenance and should be back soon.

The Coalition’s made up of three parts – not two

Last Updated: Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

Dear Subscriber,

The conventional view of the Coalition is that it’s made up of two parts – the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats. But there’s another way of thinking of it: as being made up of three – the Conservative right, the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party, and the Clegg/Cameron coalition leadership.

There’s plenty of background material to flesh out this picture of the Coalition, as well as direct evidence from recent days. In examining both, I’ll concentrate on the role of David Cameron as Prime Minister in relation to his party.

First, it’s worth remembering that many new Conservative MPs – 49 per cent of the whole Parliamentary Party – aren’t signed up to the Cameron project. A Conservative Home survey of candidates towards the end of the last Parliament found that only a third of candidates in Tory target seats were members of the leader’s favoured A-list – or Priority List, to give it its official title. Though not ideological hardliners, their views tended to be traditionally Conservative – for example, their top priority was cutting the budget deficit. Their bottom was reducing Britain’s carbon footprint.

Second, many old Conservative MPs – that is, those who entered Westminster at previous elections – feel that they’ve lost out under Cameron. Some feel that he didn’t back MPs up during the expenses scandal – insisting instead that his front bench publish theirs in detail. Others haven’t made it from the Opposition front bench to Ministerial Office – no fewer than 37 at the last count. True, some have been appointed as Parliamentary Private Secretaries – unpaid assistants to Ministers – but others have probably seen the end of their front-bench careers, and are unhappy.

Third, both old and new Conservative MPs have mixed feelings about the Coalition. On the one hand, most are delighted that their Party’s in government after 13 long years in Opposition, and give the Prime Minister credit for a huge boost in the Parliamentary numbers. On the other, a lot of them – by no means all on the right – dislike the Liberal Democrats and are uneasy about working with them. And nearly all of them, at one time or another, ask: shouldn’t we have won outright? Some blame Cameron for, as they see it, throwing away an opinion poll lead of – at one juncture – some 25 points.

There’s hard evidence for these tensions between the leadership and the backbenches. No sooner was the Coalition formed than the new Prime Minister attempted to abolish the 1922 Committee of Conservative backbenchers. He proposed to merge it, in effect, with his front bench. It’s been claimed that the suggestion was put to him by John Major, who’d plenty of trouble with the ’22, as it’s known, in his days as Prime Minister.

But whether so or not, the present Prime Minister plainly aimed to stop Graham Brady, the MP for Altrincham and Sale West and right-of-party-centre candidate for the Chairmanship, from winning. Brady resigned from Cameron’s front bench when the leadership committed a Conservative Government to not permitting new grammar schools in areas where they don’t presently exist, and his relations with the Prime Minister are strained. Cameron hoped that his front bench, if allowed to participate in the election, would vote Brady down and install instead Richard Ottoway, the left-of-party-centre candidate.

In the wake of pressure from the media and MPs, the Prime Minister quickly backed down. He may have been concerned by the breadth of the coalition against the move, have been advised that it wasn’t legally or procedurally watertight or – worst of all – been advised that Brady would win anyway, which would have dealt a heavy blow to the Government.

So given that relations between Cameron and much of his Government are difficult, where’s the evidence for the three-cornered nature of the Coalition? The row over Capital Gains Tax provides one example. Conservative backbenchers, led by John Redwood and David Davis, wanted a taper. The Liberal Democrats made a manifesto commitment to a 50% rate (and no taper). George Osborne introduced no taper…but a rise of 10% only to 28% from the present 18% rate.

And, this week, Ken Clarke’s speech on criminal justice provided another. Clarke is with the Liberal Democrats on sentencing: he said that “just banging up more and more people for longer without actively seeking to change them is what you would expect of Victorian England”. His speech was therefore bound to be read as a repudiation of the legacy of his Conservative successor as Home Secretary during the 1990s, Michael Howard. Howard stepped out to make public his disagreement with Clarke. Cameron was forced to try to find a middle way between the two positions when under pressure at Prime Minister’s Questions.

Next week, the three-sided nature of the Coalition looks to be demonstrated again when details of a bill and referendum to change the voting system for Westminster are announced. Cameron and Clegg have agreed a common position on the timing. The Liberal Democrats want to drop the first-past-the-post system and replace it with the alternative vote. Conservative MPs detest AV, fearing that it may push keep their party out power, and want to stick with FPTP. The new Labour leader will have an opportunity to drive a wedge between the two parties by agreeing with the Liberal Democrats: after all, their manifesto supported a referendum. Cameron will come under pressure from his backbenchers to detach himself from Clegg and campaign actively against AV – a course he’s unwilling to adopt.

Paul Goodman

************************

As always, please call me on 0771 726 1570 with any questions.
Tim

From the Conservative Intelligence member's site

Miliband’s Threat To Outside Earnings May Drive Tory Mps Over The Edge

Conservative MPs are capable of a wide range of emotions, encompassing the normal human set and then a few extras thrown in. Pride, injured pride, confidence, optimism, crushing depression, panic, fury, resentment, contentment, ambition, resignation, triumph and a host of others are within their repertoire. Even at the best of times, a healthy parliamentary party […]

Cameron Woos Mrs Rochester

“There’s no stunts or backroom deals, just a strong local candidate you can trust.” So wrote David Cameron in a letter sent this week to every voter in Rochester and Strood, where the next UKIP-engineered by-election is to take place towards the end of November.  At the end of it, he made the point again […]

To Respond To Defeat In Clacton, The Tories Will Need A Tougher Immigration Policy

Everyone expected the UKIP candidate, Douglas Carswell, to win in Clacton, but few people thought he would win by the enormous margin of 12,404 votes. An exceptionally rude kick has been administered to David Cameron. It is not much consolation for the Conservatives that a scarcely less rude kick has been administered to Ed Miliband […]

The Tories Leave Birmingham With A New-Found Confidence

No-one knew quite what to expect when the Conservative family gathered in Birmingham on Sunday. Mark Reckless had just delivered the second UKIP defection blow in as many months, and Brooks Newmark’s indiscretions were causing embarrassment (though less existential questions for the party). If anything, observers might have expected a depressed conference mood. Instead, though, […]

21 People To Watch As Next Week’s Conservative Conference Looms

1. Those two MP defectors to UKIP – if, of course, they exist at all.  If so, they will presumably turn up on Saturday evening.  If they don’t, the media will treat this as a further sign that the Party isn’t grown-up, since it talked but didn’t deliver.   2. George Osborne. The Conservative election […]

Will Cameron Go Fast And Slow On Devolution All-Around?

The Prime Minister announced this morning that more devolution for Scotland and reform elsewhere – specifically, action on English votes for English laws – will take place “in tandem” and “at the same pace”.  Draft legislation will be “published by January”. His statement opens up two possible outcomes. The first is that he pushes for […]

Whatever The Result, The Scottish Referendum Has Killed Blair’s Devolution Settlement

The Scottish referendum result is up in the air – polls swing from No to Yes and back again, all within the margin of error. The rush from Westminster to Scotland, not only of the party leaders but of scores of Labour MPs, demonstrates how seriously the prospect of a Yes result is being taken. […]

Two Conservative Scenarios If Scotland Votes Yes

Scenario One: David Cameron does not resign as Prime Minister (or as Conservative leader).  Nor does any member of the Cabinet other than Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat Scottish Secretary.  The Coalition hangs together.  The Conservative Parliamentary Party rallies round its leader. UKIP’s attempt to provoke an English nationalist backlash comes to nothing.  Perhaps unexpectedly, […]

Cameron’s Ability To Neutralise Opponents Is Brilliantly Illustrated By His Handling Of The New Surveillance Law

David Cameron will always do what the Establishment considers to be prudent.  The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill, sprung upon the Cabinet on Thursday morning, is a case in point. Cameron has been told by the security services that these powers are needed. He has therefore set out to square Nick Clegg and Ed […]

Why Critical Headlines About Donor Dinners Raise A Smile In Downing Street

In politics, as with so many things, it’s tempting to judge a book by its cover. The personalities, the catchphrases, the emotional and cultural baggage carried by politicians and parties all compete for our attention. They’re important, of course, but they’re only one part of the political process. The showbiz elements often distract people from […]